You Are Here > Basketball-Reference.com > BBR Blog > NBA and College Basketball Analysis

SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all Basketball-Reference content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.

Also, our existing Basketball-Reference blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.

Basketball-Reference.com // Sports Reference

For more from Neil, check out his new work at BasketballProspectus.com.

«
»

NY Times: Sizing Up the All-Stars

Posted by Justin Kubatko on February 17, 2011

The title says it all:

Keeping Score: Sizing Up the All-Stars

Look for it in tomorrow's print edition as well.

Related posts:

    NY Times: Why the Knicks Are Winning
    NY Times: The Bad Contract
    NY Times: N.B.A.’s Haves and Have-Nots
    NY Times: The Story Arc of the 3-Point Shot
    NY Times: The Cavaliers’ Decline Is on Record Pace

ShareThis

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 17th, 2011 at 9:48 pm and is filed under NY Times. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “NY Times: Sizing Up the All-Stars”

  1. Robert August de Meijer Says:
    February 18th, 2011 at 6:14 am

    I hope not too many people think: "you choose Albridge above Anthony because you work for Portland". I'm also afraid just briefly mentioning that Albridge is a better defender (without stats to back that up) might confuse people.

    Anyhow, I can only agree with you.

  2. Babbler Says:
    February 18th, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    Those charts in the Times columns always look very sloppy because the "0"s are omitted from the end of decimals. You guys need to fix that, or get the Times to fix it.

  3. koberulz Says:
    February 21st, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    "Another exercise in the long-running demonstration that statistics are a lousy way to measure good basketball play."

    Righto then...how else do we determine anything?

«
»